Notes
Davidson 1883, pp. 289-90; PN Devon, p. 447; Finberg, ECDC, no. 56; Whitelock 1959, p. 82, cited; Chaplais 1965, p. 60 n. 105, script of MS 1 compared with that of S 963; Chaplais 1966, pp. 23-4 (no. 23), MS 1 authentic and original, probably by Crediton scribe also responsible for S 963, boundary clause as in S 389, MS 2 is a fragment of a copy by an Exeter scribe (= 1981, XV pp. 23-4); Bishop 1971, p. xxiii n. 5, on script; HRH, p. 237, probably original, subscriptions are consistent; Hart, ECNE, p. 25 n. 1, in MS 1 dating clause and witness-list were added after folding; Keynes 1980, p. 27 n. 43, p. 36 n. 65, p. 126 n. 136; BA Facs., p. 9, MS 2 could be a fragment of a copy of a charter other than S 971, since it contains only part of a proem; Dumville 1993, pp. 133, 134, regressive script; Lawson 1993, pp. 67-8, 238, apparent original, probably drafted in south-west; Hooke 1994, pp. 195-6, bounds as S 389; Keynes 1994/1, p. 50, written by Crediton scribe, witness-list based on that of a charter of c. 1026 x 1030; Keynes 1996, p. 37 n. 199, on witness-list
